Gender identity

Proxvir

Boyish, but not a boy. Masculine, but not male — standing right next to manhood without ever being inside it.

Category
Non-Binary
Pronouns
Any set
Read
6 min

Overview

What proxvir means.

Proxvir means near-man. Prox- from the Latin for near, -vir from the Latin for man. The two phrases it was built around are "boyish, but not boy" and "masculine, but not male".

It points at a gender that stands beside maleness rather than inside it. Not half male. Not male-in-progress. Not a man with unusual hobbies. Something adjacent, with its own shape, that keeps almost matching the word man and never quite does.

Now the honest part, because you deserve it before you read three thousand words. Proxvir is a small word. It was coined on Tumblr in the mid-2010s — 2014 by most accounts — by a user called wulfgendur, alongside its counterpart juxera, meaning near-woman. It lives on a handful of wiki pages and a thinner handful of blog posts. There is almost no written record of anyone's ordinary life under it.

So what follows is drawn from the definition and from what near-male actually implies day to day, not from a large body of shared experience. There isn't one. Anyone who tells you what the proxvir community thinks is making it up.

The people who do use it disagree on the meaning. One reading: proxvir is near maleness, bordering it, almost touching. Another, which turns up on some wikis: proxvir is masculine but has no relationship to manhood at all — the masculinity is real, the manhood was never there to be near. Both are in circulation. One may describe you and the other may not.

It says nothing about what you were assigned at birth, what your body looks like, what you wear, or what you intend to do about any of it.

A gender similar to or near masculinity, but not masculine itself. Close to but distinct from male.

Proxvir in one line

Origin

Where the word comes from

Proxvir was coined by Tumblr user wulfgendur in July 2014, alongside its counterpart juxera (near-woman), in a post introducing several new gender terms. The name is built from Latin: prox- from proximus, meaning near, and -vir, a masculine noun for man — so, literally, near-man.

The original flag isn't a stripe design but a spectrum diagram: a pentagon shading from pink through blue-grey, navy and purple to blue, with a green triangle marking where proxvir sits on that spectrum, close to but not at the "boy" end. Later versions by other users have redrawn it, and none has become the agreed standard.

Coined by
wulfgendur (Tumblr)
First recorded
2014
Where
Tumblr

Signs people describe

Common experiences

None of these is a test. Most people recognise a few and shrug at the rest.

01

"Mate", "bro", "sir", "man" — whichever your part of the world uses, none of them are wrong. None are right either. They land the way a nickname lands: aimed at you, not quite you.

02

You want to be read as masculine by a stranger at a counter.

You do not want your closest friend to think of you as a man.

03

You have ticked M on a form and felt neither dishonest nor described.

04

In a group of men you feel like a guest who has been made genuinely welcome. Welcome is not the same as being one of them, and you know the difference from the inside.

05

You reach for the word man about yourself, get halfway through the sentence, and put it back.

06

Masculinity feels like yours.

Manhood feels like a house you have a key to and don't live in.

07

You are not looking for a midpoint between man and woman.

You are not between anything. You are beside one of them.

08

The gap between you and man is small and it does not close.

Years go by and it is exactly the same size.

09

You have read the demiboy definition three times trying to make it fit, and it is the word partly that keeps failing.

Day to day

What it looks like on a normal Tuesday

Nothing about the day announces it.\n\nThe coffee place calls you mate, or sir, or bro, whatever your city runs on. You take it. It is the nearest thing on offer and it is free.\n\nWork chat has a pronoun field. You put he/him in it two years ago and have not touched it since. It is not a lie. It is just not the whole sentence, and the field is small.\n\nThe group chat says alright boys. You reply. There is a half-second — so short you stopped noticing it years ago — where you clock that you answered to something that is not your name.\n\nAt home the mirror is fine. Short hair, the clothes you settled on, whatever shape you have built. It reads masculine and that is what you wanted. Nobody watching would guess there is a word for the last five percent. Most days you do not think about it either.\n\nThat is the texture of it. Not anguish. A very small, very persistent almost.

Across the parts of a life

Open the area you came here for.

Straight answers

What people get wrong

It's demiboy with a longer word.

They overlap, and plenty of people could honestly use either. But demiboy says partly a boy — a real fraction of your gender is male. Proxvir says next to it, nothing inside. If partly is the exact word that keeps not working for you, that is the difference doing its job.

Someone invented it on Tumblr, so it isn't real.

Someone did invent it on Tumblr, and there is no point pretending otherwise. Every word for this was made by somebody — transgender had a coiner and a date too. A word being young and small tells you about the word, not about the thing it is pointing at.

It's a stopping point on the way to being a man.

For some people it has been. They used it for a year, dropped it, transitioned, never looked back. For others it is where they stayed. Nobody can tell you in advance which you are, and using it now costs you nothing later.

If you want testosterone or surgery, you're really just a man.

Bodies and genders are separate questions. Wanting a lower voice, a flat chest, a beard is about what you want to live inside. It does not retroactively make you a man, any more than a man who wants none of those things stops being one.

You're a woman running from the word woman. Or a man in denial.

Only you can check that, and it is worth actually checking rather than defending against. What is worth noticing: this gets aimed at everyone who won't pick a side, hardest by people who need the sides to hold. And if the honest answer turns out to be yes — that is information you needed, not a defeat.

Take care

On the hard days

The specific loneliness of this one is bibliographic. You search the word at 2am and get four wiki pages, two of which contradict each other, and a listicle from years ago using genders like yours as a punchline. Nothing to read. Nobody's memoir. No forum where people are just living it.\n\nRare does not mean false. But thinness gets inside your head, and on a bad night it argues that a feeling with almost no literature behind it must be something you invented to be interesting.\n\nThen there is the near-miss, which is its own kind of tiredness. Being called something almost right, all day, for years, is heavier than being called something plainly wrong once. It never gives you a moment worth objecting to, so it never gets objected to.\n\nAnd the double exclusion. Men's spaces sense you are not quite in. Women's spaces keep claiming you back. Being welcome in both while belonging to neither wears at a particular spot.\n\nWhat helps is smaller than a word. One friend who says \"you're not really a bloke, are you\" and means it kindly. Someone seeing the gap and not needing it explained. That is usually enough to get through the night, and it does not require anyone to learn any Latin.

Pronouns

Pronouns

No pronoun set comes with this word. He/him is the most common by a distance, because it gets you treated as masculine without a conversation. They/them, he/they, mixed sets and neopronouns are all in use. Using he/him does not make you a man, and using they/them does not make you less masculine. Plenty of people run he/him in public and something else in their own head, or with two friends. If you are not out, the pronouns you were handed at birth are what you use, and that changes nothing about what you are.

All pronoun sets →

Consider another path

This might not be your word if…

  • 1You feel partly male — an actual portion, not a proximity. Read demiboy first.
  • 2You are a man. An unusual one, or a gentle one, or one who wants nothing to do with what men are supposed to be. That is a man having opinions about men, not a separate gender.
  • 3The distance moves. Some weeks you are all the way in, some weeks nowhere near. Look at boyflux or genderfluid before this.
  • 4You have no gender at all, and near male only describes how you present. Presentation and gender are different claims.
  • 5It shows up mainly as a reaction — you feel near-male when someone calls you a woman, and barely think about it otherwise. That might be a response to the wrong word rather than the right one. Watch it for a few months when nobody is misgendering you.
  • 6You are a trans man early on, and not quite a man feels safer to say than man. Very common, entirely understandable, and worth being honest with yourself about. Nothing bad happens if you take the bigger word later.
  • 7You like it because it is rare and precise and nobody else you know has it. That pull is real. It is not the same thing as recognition.
  • 8You had to read the definition four times to make it apply. Words for this are meant to land, not to be argued into position.

Questions people ask

Frequently asked questions

Is proxvir the same as demiboy?+

No, though people use both loosely and some use them together. Demiboy means partly male. Proxvir means beside male, with nothing inside. If partly fits, take demiboy — it is older, better documented, and far more people will know what you mean without a explanation.

Can I be proxvir and use he/him?+

Yes, and most people who use the word do. Pronouns are a request about how you want to be spoken of, not a report on the contents of your gender. He/him is the smoothest available route to being treated as masculine without opening a conversation you may not want to have.

Can I be proxvir and medically transition?+

Yes. Nothing in the term rules out testosterone, surgery, or a legal change. Wanting a masculine body is a separate matter from claiming manhood. Practically, you may have to use the word man with clinicians and forms to get treated — that is a gate, not a self-description.

Do you have to be AFAB to be proxvir?+

No. Nothing in the definition mentions assignment at birth. The visible use has skewed towards people assigned female, but people assigned male who feel masculine and were never at home in manhood use it too, and the definition covers them cleanly.

Is proxvir a real gender, or did someone just make it up?+

Both, honestly. It was coined on Tumblr around 2014 by a user called wulfgendur, along with juxera. Maybe a few hundred people have ever used it. That is the true scale. Real is the wrong question — the useful one is whether it makes your own life clearer. If it does, keep it. If you need a word other people already know, non-binary or transmasculine will do the public-facing work.

The flag

Designer (Wulfgendur) and month (July 2014) recorded, but the design is a pentagon with a triangle, not stripes; no hex values.

Sources

Still figuring things out?

Twenty questions, four minutes, and a few words worth trying on.